Sally
Mann is a photographer whose works have been highly criticized because they are
believed to be child pornography. I disagree with this because from what I have
read, Mann's children have known and understood the types of images their
mother made of them as well as the ideas that other people could get from the
images themselves. I don't believe that Sally Mann was ever in the wrong,
because her images were to photograph her children in their preadolescence
rather than trying to sexualize them or turn them into objects. Personally I
like Mann's work in the idea that her images are sharp, but also incredibly
dark. I like that all of her images are of her children as a mother looking at
her kids and what they do. I don't like that people automatically go to
the idea that nudity is equivalent to pornography. While there are some things
that can make it more pornographic, overall, I don't believe that nudity is
created outrightly with the idea to be pornographic. Obviously there are
certain images where that's just not true, but with Sally Mann's work- she was
just photographing her children. There was nothing else going on that was bad.
She allowed her children to do their work, and according to what I read in the
New York Times, her children knew what was going on. They got irritated when
Mann was going to release her collection, "Immediate Family" in 10-15
years after she was done photographing them so that her children would fully
understand. From what I read in the Times article, the children got incredibly
irritated and so Mann and her husband had a psychologist talk to them so that
they would understand if the children really knew what the consequences and
perceptions could be once the collection was released. I really
like Mann’s work in how it’s so dark and the images are so put together and
feeling. They aren’t just lame pieces of work that don’t really intrigue the
audience. Looking at Mann’s images makes me wonder how she got the ideas for everything
and why she chose to continue making images in the way that she was even though
there were so many comments on child pornography. I like that in her artist
statements in the Times that she said she was just doing what she thought was
the best to be a mother. I like that idea, because in a hundred years, people might
not remember her, but they’ll be able to see the images and possibly get over
the immediate reaction of pornography and rather, see it as art.
sources:
http://www.artnet.com/artists/sally-mann/
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/magazine/the-disturbing-photography-of-sally-mann.html
No comments:
Post a Comment