Personally, I think that Sally Mann was in the right,
and should not be judged or criticized for her actions. The photographs of her children,
encapsulated playfulness, peacefulness, happiness, and overall innocence. I
think that her photographs should be viewed as so, and not through a perverted lens.
While researching this heated topic, I learned
more about Sally’s personality and her motivation behind “Immediate Family”. Mrs.
Mann was sent terrible letters, that she called “Bad Mother” letters, criticizing
her about her parenting and her actions. However, she is just like any other
mom. She walked her kids to and from school, went to their concerts and soccer
games, changed wet beds, and packed healthy school lunches. A lot of people
thought that Sally was wrong for taking nude pictures of her children, because they
couldn’t give consent. Sally tells us that her children were in full control of
their photographs. They helped set the scene, produce the desired effects, and
edited them. She never published a photograph that her children didn’t approve of
or weren’t comfortable with. An example that she gives us in her article: “Sally
Mann’s Exposure”, brings light on how Emmett thought of one of his photographs. When
Emmett was 13, he asked his mom to exclude a picture form the book, “Immediate
Family”. He was pretending to be Bugs Bunny and was wearing nothing but long
white socks on his arms. He wasn’t uncomfortable with the fact that he was nude,
but that he didn’t want to seem like a dork, due to the socks on his arms. This
just goes to show that Sally’s kids didn’t mind being photographed in the nude.
I think that Sally’s intentions for taking
these pictures are just and should not be considered pornographic. This book
shows the true freedom, and innocence of childhood. The very landscape they
grew up on has a great importance on how we perceive these images. They are
isolated from the chaotic and fast passed world. Their playgrounds were rivers,
cliffs, and fields. The images capture the overall feeling of growing up in
that environment, and the freedom and innocence that comes with it. I think to
look at these pictures as pornographic, switches the whole meaning and purpose for
why these children where photographed in the first place. They weren’t hindered
by the rules of a more populated area, and were given a chance to explore, and
be creative.
Works Cited
Bengal, Rebecca.
“After Sally Mann's Memoir, a New Look at Her Most Famous Photographs.” Vogue,
Vogue, 1 Feb. 2017, www.vogue.com/article/sally-mann-immediate-family-reissue-memoir-hold-still.
Mann, Sally. “Sally Mann's Exposure.” The
New York Times, The New York Times, 16 Apr. 2015, www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/magazine/the-cost-of-sally-manns-exposure.html.
Woodward, Richard B. “The Disturbing
Photography of Sally Mann.” The New York Times, The New York Times,
19 Jan. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/magazine/the-disturbing-photography-of-sally-mann.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment